MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599121104 · doi:10.21512/bbr.v3i1.1296

Audit Operasional Atas Siklus Pendapatan pada PT New Inti Furnindo Cabang Bandung

2012· article· en· W1599121104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefanus Ariyanto, Juli Selvi Yanti

Bibliographic record

VenueBinus Business Review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessRevenueBranch officeQuarter (Canadian coin)AuditCashFinanceMarketingAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PT New Inti Furnindo Branch Bandung is a private company engaged in the knock-down furniture trade, ,which is a branch of the PT New Inti Furnindo Branch Jakarta. The products sold are produced centrally in Jakarta. The problems faced by this company are annual sales that never meet the targets set by the head quarter, the problems in the organizational structure and procedures of sales and cash receipts that are considered less effective and efficient in achieving corporate objectives. The method used to examine the issue is to do a descriptive analysis to compare the current condition with criteria or standards that should be implemented, examined data relating to the company's revenue cycle and then make direct observations on the implementation of sales procedures, and conduct interviews with officials related to findings. The results indicate that the sales target setting is not effective, the establishment of sales procedures and organizational structures that are inefficient. This condition will cause the company less economies, which in turn affect the company’s going concern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBinus Business ReviewSame topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207