Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The strategic use of information technology ( IT ) is critical in linking the use of IT to organizational benefits. The objective of this article is to provide a succinct overview of the research investigating the strategic use of IT in organizations. To do so, this article defines the concept of strategic use of IT and summarizes the three main theoretical perspectives from which strategic IT use has been investigated. First, the traditional microeconomic perspective, which analyzes the strategic use of IT according to five industry forces and the value chain activities of a given firm. Second, the resource‐based view of the firm, which emphasizes that the use of IT can only lead to competitive advantage when complemented with other critical resources to create rare, valuable, and inimitable resources. Third, the dynamic capability perspective, grounded in Schumpeterian economics, which highlights that the strategic use of IT should serve to enhance the capability of a firm to reconfigure its competencies to rapidly respond to changing business conditions. The article ends with a brief discussion on future avenues for research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it