Nouvelles réflexions sur les travailleurs et la grève de Kirkland Lake, 1941–1942
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pendant pres de trois mois, les travailleurs de huit des douze mines d’or de Kirkland Lake tentent d’obtenir sans succes la reconnaissance syndicale1. Leur greve, qui s’echelonne du 18 novembre 1941 au 12 fevrier 1942, permet de contester d’abord et avant tout le refus des dirigeants des mines de vouloir negocier avec le local 240 du syndicat Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers puis, dans la meme foulee, de reconnaitre celui-ci comme le representant legitime et officiel des travailleurs. Plus important encore, cette greve est declenchee au cœur de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, dans une industrie alors jugee essentielle a l’effort de guerre, a un moment ou la victoire des allies est loin d’etre acquise. Si ce conflit attire plusieurs critiques des citoyens de l’epoque, il reussit tout de meme a mobiliser des milliers de travailleurs ainsi que plusieurs centrales syndicales a travers le pays. La greve des mines d’or de Kirkland Lake fait l’objet de plusieurs remarques dans les ouvrages se rapportant a l’histoire du mouvement ouvrier canadien2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".