MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599691257

Geology and Wine 2. A geological foundation for terroirs and potential sub-appellations of Niagara Peninsula wines, Ontario, Canada

2000· article· en· W1599691257 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Simon J. Haynes

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyEscarpmentBedrockHoloceneArchaeologyQuaternaryGeomorphologyPleistoceneRhyoliteCavePaleontologyVolcanoGeographyVolcanic rock
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All of the vineyards in Niagara are planted on soils derived from a variety of Late Pleistocene to Early Holocene, subglacial and proglacial sediments. These were deposited during a series of Late Wisconsinan continental ice advances and retreats, on a landscape that had been carved into the Paleozoic bedrock by this and earlier Quaternary glaciations to form the several landforms that exist above, on, and below the cuesta of the Niagara Escarpment. This paper proposes that the existing delineation of grape viticultural areas, by climate zone, be considerably modified by the recognition that it is the significant differences in the geology that control distinction of terroirs and sub- appellations based on variation of land-form physiography, soil types, and groundwater flow conditions. From considerations of these geological and climatic differences, in combination with wine profiles distinguished by J-L. Groux, winemaker at Hillebrand Estates, the Niagara Peninsula Designated Viticultural Area can be divided into at least eight sub- appellations . Resume Tous les vignobles de la region du Niagara croissent dans des sols issus d'une variete de sediments sous-glaciaux et pro-glaciaux de la fin du Pleistocene et du debut de l'Holocene. Ces sediments ont ete deposes lors d'avancees et de retraits glaciaires wisconsiniens sur un substratum de couches ordoviciennes sculptees par l'action de glaciations qui ont precedees et qui ont laisser les nombreuses formes de relief que l'on peut voir sur et de part et d'autre de la cuesta de l'escarpement du Niagara. Dans le present article, nous proposons que la delimitation actuelle des diverses zones viticoles par zone climatique soit revisee en profondeur afin de tenir compte de variations significatives de nature geologique et qui determinent les differents terroirs et sous-appellations en fonction de la physiographie du paysage, des types de sol et des parametres de l'ecoulement hydrique. En combinant de telles considerations geologiques et climatiques aux differents profils viticoles etablis par J.-L. Groulx, viticulteur au domaine Hillebrand, la region viticole du Niagara pourrait etre subdivisee en huit sous-divisions au moins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207