MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1599755550 · doi:10.1029/2005wr004619

Stochastic optimization of multireservoir operation: The optimal reservoir trajectory approach

2007· article· en· W1599755550 on OpenAlexaff
André Turgeon

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpillageTrajectoryMathematical optimizationStochastic programmingDynamic programmingSeries (stratigraphy)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Petroleum engineeringEngineeringMathematicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a new method for determining the optimal operating policy of a power system of several reservoirs in series. The method, called optimal reservoir trajectory (ORT), is based on the following fact: Raising the level of a reservoir feeding a power plant is profitable as long as the gain due to the higher head is greater than the loss due to the additional spillage. There consequently exists a reservoir level at time t at which the expected energy generation is maximized. The task of ORT is to find this level and use it to operate the reservoir. The problem is more complicated for several reservoirs in series since the optimal level of each reservoir is a function of the levels of all the other reservoirs. The paper shows how to solve this problem and presents the results obtained for systems of two, three, and seven reservoirs. The results for the systems of two and three reservoirs are compared with those obtained with stochastic dynamic programming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207