MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W159975995 · doi:10.1512/iumj.2004.53.2355

Strong unique continuation property for an elasticity system with residual stress

2004· article· en· W159975995 on OpenAlexaff
Ching-Lung Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueIndiana University Mathematics Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuationMathematicsElasticity (physics)ResidualProperty (philosophy)Residual stressComposite materialAlgorithmComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we prove the strong unique continuation property for an elasticity system with small residual stress. This system is not isotropic due to the existence of the residual stress. Therefore, it is impossible to reduce the principal part of the system to uncoupled Laplacian operators as we have for the isotropic elasticity system. Also, the coefficients of the system are allowed to have some singularities. The proof of the main theorem is based on Carleman estimates with singular weights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndiana University Mathematics JournalSame topicNumerical methods in inverse problemsFrench-language works237,207