MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1600026042 · doi:10.7202/1025190ar

Rompre avec la norme en 1931

2014· article· fr· W1600026042 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Véronique Lord

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Québec, dans les années 1930, l’idéologie dominante construit une image précise de la femme et lui impose un rôle qui lui laisse peu d’autonomie. Or, Dans les ombres, premier roman d’une jeune poète, Éva Senécal, s’écarte de la norme : il raconte comment une épouse s’éprend d’un Américain de passage, pose un regard critique sur l’idéologie traditionnelle et aspire à se définir et à agir selon des valeurs et des désirs véritablement siens. S’appuyant sur les principes et les théories de la critique littéraire au féminin, le présent article montre qu’en donnant à lire une héroïne qui défie les règles de conduite d’une épouse et qui veut s’affirmer sujet et agent de sa propre vie, de même qu’en rompant avec plusieurs normes en matière d’écriture, Senécal parvenait à mettre en relief une vision différente des femmes et de l’ordre établi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.017
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et Images→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→