MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600026853 · doi:10.7202/010262ar

De l’union légalisée à la naissance légalisée : évolution du lien entre mariage et premier enfant en Suisse

2004· article· fr· W1600026853 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laurence Charton

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers québécois de démographie · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceLienArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Suisse partage, en matière de diversité des formes de vie conjugale, de nombreux traits communs aux autres pays occidentaux: baisse de la fécondité et de la nuptialité, recul de l'âge au mariage, hausse de la cohabitation. Elle présente aussi quelques caractéristiques particulières intéressantes, notamment un faible niveau de fécondité hors mariage. L'analyse d'une enquête sur la famille menée en 1994-1995 permet de décrire les relations entre mariage et première naissance et d'interpréter le maintien à un niveau élevé des naissances survenant dans le cadre du mariage alors que le nombre des unions consensuelles est en hausse. Les résultats montrent que les conceptions prénuptiales sont fréquentes, mais presque toujours suivies d'un mariage. Ces conceptions, qui furent l'apanage des ferrnmes ne vivant pas avec le père, concernent aujourd'hui des femmes en cohabitation. Naguère réparateur d'une grossesse non voulue, le malriage devient accompagnateur d'un projet de fécondité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers québécois de démographieSame topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207