Death Decoy Receptor TR6/DcR3 Inhibits T Cell Chemotaxis In Vitro and In Vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TR6/DcR3 is a secreted molecule belonging to the TNFR family. Its ligands are LIGHT, Fas ligand, and TL1A, all TNF family members. TR6 is expressed in some tumors and is hypothesized to endow tumor cells with survival advantages by blocking Fas-mediated apoptosis. It can also inhibit T cell activation by interfering with two-way T cell costimulation between LIGHT and HveA. In this study, we discovered a novel function of TR6: inhibition of T cell chemotaxis. Human T cells pretreated with soluble or solid-phase TR6-Fc showed compromised migration toward CXCL12/stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha in vitro in a Transwell assay. Such an effect could also be observed in T cells pretreated with soluble or solid-phase HveA-Fc or anti-LIGHT mAb, suggesting that LIGHT reverse signaling was likely responsible for chemotaxis inhibition. TR6 pretreatment also led to T cell chemotaxis suppression in vivo in the mice, confirming in vivo relevance of the in vitro observation. Mechanistically, a small GTPase Cdc42 failed to be activated after TR6 pretreatment of human T cells, and further downstream, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, actin polymerization, and pseudopodium formation were all down-regulated in the treated T cells. This study revealed a previously unknown function of TR6 in immune regulation, and such an effect could conceivably be explored for therapeutic use in controlling undesirable immune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".