MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600085281 · doi:10.22099/ijsts.2005.2811

ANGULAR DEPENDENT MAGNETORESISTANCE OSCILLATION IN STAGE-2 IBR GRAPHITE INTERCALATION COMPOUND

2005· article· en· W1600085281 on OpenAlexaff
Mansoor Barati, P. K. Ummat, G. M. Luke, W. R. Datars

Bibliographic record

VenueIranian Journal of Science and Technology (Sciences) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetoresistanceGraphite intercalation compoundFermi surfaceOscillation (cell signaling)Condensed matter physicsMagnetic fieldQuantum oscillationsGraphiteChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The angular dependent magnetoresistance oscillation (ADMRO) of the stage-2 IBr graphiteintercalation compound (GIC) was studied between 1.8 K and 110 K in magnetic fields between 1 and 9T. There was a series of peaks in the c-axis resistance as the field direction was changed from the c axisto the (001) plane. The field independence of the angular positions of the peaks, showing that theoscillation is not from the Shubnikov-de Haas effect, and the presence of the oscillation at hightemperatures indicate that the effect is semiclassic. The location and the relative amplitudes of the peaksshow that the ADMRO in this compound does not follow the predictions for the symmetrical corrugationmodel of the cylindrical Fermi surface. The reason is attributed to the presence of two cylindrical Fermisurfaces and zone folding of the Fermi surface by the periodicity of the IBr lattice in this compound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIranian Journal of Science and Technology (Sciences)Same topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207