MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1600117701 · doi:10.7202/017628ar

Impacts de la restructuration du réseau d’autobus de la ville de Québec sur l’accessibilité aux emplois des femmes et sur leur mobilité professionnelle

2008· article· fr· W1600117701 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Marion Vincens, Marie‐Hélène Vandersmissen, Marius Thériault

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de géographie du Québec · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersMinistère des Transports
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le réseau d’autobus de la ville de Québec a subi une importante restructuration en 1992 avec la création du Métrobus et l’ajout de lignes express. L’objectif de cet article est de vérifier si la restructuration de ce réseau a permis d’améliorer l’accessibilité aux emplois des résidentes et de favoriser leur mobilité professionnelle. Les données des enquêtesorigine-destinationde 1991 et 2001 réalisées par le ministère des Transports du Québec et le Réseau de transport de la Capitale sont mises à profit. Les variations spatiales et temporelles des différents indicateurs montrent une diminution sensible des durées de déplacement et une amélioration de l’accessibilité aux emplois à partir de certains secteurs de la ville et ce, en dépit d’une diminution de la part modale de l’autobus, même dans les couloirs du Métrobus. Par ailleurs, la mobilité professionnelle des femmes semble avoir progressé dans plusieurs secteurs desservis par le Métrobus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de géographie du Québec→Same topicUrban Transport and Accessibility→French-language works237,207→