MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600281312 · doi:10.7202/032739ar

Glaciotectonic Structures in Central Sweden and their Significance for Glacial Theory

2007· article· en· W1600281312 on OpenAlexaffvenue
James S. Aber, Jan Lundqvist

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersEmporia State University
KeywordsGeologyGlacial periodBedrockIce sheetLandformStadialGeomorphologyPleistocenePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various glaciotectonic structures and landforms created by ice pushing are common in drift and interstadial sediments in a narrow belt of central Sweden. Described examples from the Lake Storsjôn vicinity demonstrate that glaciotectonic deformation took place while the area was deeply covered by the last Fennoscandian Ice Sheet. Deformation was controlled by pressure gradients related to position of the ice divide and ice movement away from the divide. As the position of the divide shifted during the last glaciation, so did the orientation of glaciotectonic structures. The regional distribution of glaciotectonic features in Fennoscandia falls into three zones: (1) inner zone of widespread, small- to moderate-sized features in older drift, (2) intermediate zone of small, isolated features in drift of the last glaciation, and (3) outer zone with all manner of large and small features in drift and soft bedrock. These zones are the cumulative results of multiple glaciations and reflect the overall distribution of deformable sediment and bedrock within the continental substratum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et QuaternaireSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207