MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600301992 · doi:10.5206/entrehojas.v2i1.6129

Confección de una ficha terminológica del cambio climático y el efecto invernadero

2012· article· es· W1600301992 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kerwin A. Livingstone

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios Hispánicos · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJournalism and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta presente labor tiene como finalidad presentar la confección de una ficha terminológica que muestra la recopilación de 100 términos de un campo especializado, las ciencias del medio ambiente. Para este estudio, el ámbito considerado es la contaminación de la atmósfera, el cambio climático y efecto invernadero. Se da un esbozo sobre los orígenes de la terminología y su necesidad absoluta en el siglo actual por algunos proponentes más importantes del área. Se proporcionan los procedimientos realizados en este trabajo con fines de dar como resultado una ficha elaborada. Igualmente, se mencionan las fases obligatorias en la elaboración de glosarios, diccionarios y listados especializados tanto como los componentes imprescindibles que se deben tomar en cuenta al momento de crear una ficha terminológica. Luego, se presenta un análisis de los resultados de la fabricación de la ficha mediante tablas y gráficos, y una discusión sobre los resultados obtenidos. Se establecen la importancia y la envergadura de esta investigación para todos los interesados en trabajos de tal carácter. Finalmente, se da una muestra de la ficha terminológica confeccionada a través de la recopilación de dos términos especializados. The objective of this present work is to produce a terminology record that highlights the collection of 100 terms from a specialized field, that is, environmental science. For this study, the area under consideration is air pollution, climate change and the greenhouse effect”. An outline is given, as it relates to the origins of terminology, and its absolute necessity in this century, by some of the leading proponents in this ambit. The procedures performed in this work are also discussed, with the aim of arriving at a compiled record. Mentioned also are the obligatory steps required for the preparation of glossaries, dictionaries and specialized listings, as well as the essential components which must be taken into account when creating a terminology record. An analysis of the results of the created record is then presented by means of tables and graphs, followed by a discussion of the results. The importance and scope of this research are established for all those interested in works of such character. Finally, a sample of 2 specialized terms is given from the compiled glossary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntrehojas Revista de Estudios HispánicosSame topicJournalism and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207