MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600342926

Fuzzy cognitive map based situation assessment for coastal surveillance

2008· article· en· W1600342926 on OpenAlex
S. Chandana, Henry Leung, Éloi Bossé, Pierre Valin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Information Fusion · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy cognitive mapComputer scienceFuzzy logicInference engineData miningSensor fusionArtificial intelligenceInferenceCognitive mapAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemCausality (physics)Fuzzy inference systemMachine learningFuzzy control systemCausal inferenceCognitionMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) approach to develop an inference engine to perform goal reasoning based on information gathered by a sensor network. Fuzzy nodes are used to represent the goals and sub-goals in the system and conditional causality regulates inference in the network. Statistical estimates obtained from a preceding data fusion operation are converted into fuzzy memberships and then propagated through the causal structure of the FCM. Sensor information based decisions are fused into higher level goals and premises until the system level objective is achieved. The developed situation assessment framework has been evaluated for two search scenario simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it