MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600342926

Fuzzy cognitive map based situation assessment for coastal surveillance

2008· article· en· W1600342926 on OpenAlexaff
S. Chandana, Henry Leung, Éloi Bossé, Pierre Valin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Information Fusion · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy cognitive mapComputer scienceFuzzy logicInference engineData miningSensor fusionArtificial intelligenceInferenceCognitive mapAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemCausality (physics)Fuzzy inference systemMachine learningFuzzy control systemCausal inferenceCognitionMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) approach to develop an inference engine to perform goal reasoning based on information gathered by a sensor network. Fuzzy nodes are used to represent the goals and sub-goals in the system and conditional causality regulates inference in the network. Statistical estimates obtained from a preceding data fusion operation are converted into fuzzy memberships and then propagated through the causal structure of the FCM. Sensor information based decisions are fused into higher level goals and premises until the system level objective is achieved. The developed situation assessment framework has been evaluated for two search scenario simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Information FusionSame topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207