MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W16003802 · doi:10.14264/uql.2020.370

Geostatistical integration of conventional and downhole geophysical data in the metalliferous mine environment

2001· dissertation· en· W16003802 on OpenAlex
Matthew Howell Kay

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe University of Queensland · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWell loggingMining engineeringDrillingGeologyData miningPetroleum engineeringGeophysicsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last few years, studies have demonstrated the potential of downhole geophysical logging in estimating ore grades in the metalliferous mining environment. Geophysical logs provide valuable, relatively inexpensive information that can further be linked to various aspects of a mining operation, such as orebody modelling, mine design and planning, grade control and production. Although financially attractive, downhole geophysical measurements provide only indirect estimates of ore grades and require integration with traditional assay data, which are measured on different support. A related issue is optimal data collection based on the value of the information downhole logs generate and other cost related considerations.This study describes the conditional simulation of ore grades in an application stressing the integration of diamond drilling assay data and downhole geophysical logs. More specifically, conductivity logs and assay data are integrated to assess the variability of copper grades at the Kidd Creek base metal mine, Ontario, Canada. Using the conductivity logs in their raw form presents problems since this data was collected every five centimetres downhole while the copper assays were acquired from drill core that can be up to 1.5m in length. This implies that a ‘representative’ value for the conductivity is needed in each of the copper assay intervals. These representative values are obtained using composites generated from a generalised power averaging which aims to maximise information extraction from conductivity data.Co-indicator sequential indicator simulation (with the Markov-Bayes shortcut) is presented as one way that conductivity logs can be integrated with the copper assays. The technique does this not only by accounting for the spatial correlation of the random variable of interest (the so-called ‘hard’ data), but also by providing a means of incorporating secondary or ‘soft’ information. Specifically using a Bayesian formalism, all the data whether hard or soft are encoded as local prior distributions. These prior distributions are then updated to posterior distributions that take into account all nearby sample data. The modelling of these posterior distributions is achieved through cokriging. A simple Markov-type hypothesis is assumed which allows the variogram of the soft data and cross-variogram of the hard and soft data to be derived directly from the variogram associated with the hard data. This avoids the task of inferring and modelling a series of cross-variograms. The simulation algorithm is then used to generate copper simulations that are based on different combinations of copper assays and conductivity logs. The various parameters required by the algorithm are discussed and values derived from the experimental data. Noteworthy among these parameters is the set of indicator cutoffs used and the specification of the indicator variograms at the very high cutoffs. This first set is chosen so that the quantity of metal is adequately characterised, while for indicator variograms an iterative calibration procedure is used to ensure convergence to declustered copper assay statistics. The validation of the simulations suggests excellent performance of the technique. It is shown to be practical for medium to large simulation sizes.A Bayesian data worth methodology that aids in deciding between alternative courses of actions in the face of uncertainty is presented. It addresses issues such as the action to be taken given an existing set of information and whether more information should be collected before an action is decided on. This general methodology is then demonstrated in two case studies using data from the Kidd Creek study area. In the first study the methodology is used to find the most profitable location for a mining stope in the study area. The study shows that, in this instance, the most profitable stope location partially depends on the sampling campaign that is followed, that is the type and quantity of information collected. However, despite this data dependency, the study demonstrates that the most cost-effective way of locating the stope is by means of a sampling campaign that consists of a mixture of copper assays and conductivity logs. In the second case study, the data worth methodology is used to examine the efficacy of using conductivity logs to classify blocks in a mining stope. It shows that, even when sampling costs are taken into account, it is slightly more cost effective to base the block classifications solely on copper assay information – despite the greater relative cost of collecting this type of information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it