MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600418807 · doi:10.7202/1021516ar

Le quatuor à cordes : une géométrie sociale

2014· article· fr· W1600418807 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Clemens Merkel, Hélène Huetz de Lemps

Bibliographic record

VenueCircuit Musiques contemporaines · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, le violoniste Clemens Merkel, membre du Quatuor Bozzini, parle des caractéristiques propres de cette formation musicale à nulle autre pareille, qui existe depuis 250 ans : le quatuor à cordes. Il en décrit le caractère immuable (toujours les quatre mêmes instruments, et jamais un de plus) et démocratique, en l’opposant notamment à d’autres formations issues du passé, comme l’orchestre symphonique, à la structure hiérarchique lourde et socialement dépassée. Après un survol de la symbolique du chiffre quatre, Merkel entreprend un bref historique, avec un détour obligé par le père de la tradition, Beethoven, et les grands innovateurs du xx e siècle. À la faveur d’une discussion sur l’éclatement des normes, avec les Kagel et autres Crumb, il conclut sur la bonne santé de la formation et ses chances de survie pour les 250 prochaines années.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.225
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCircuit Musiques contemporainesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207