MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A case of mosaic Goltz syndrome (focal dermal hypoplasia) in a male patient

2010· article· en· W1600654858 on OpenAlexaff
Anita Lasocki, Zornitza Stark, David Orchard

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralasian Journal of Dermatology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and rare skin diseases.
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenodermatosisMedicineHypoplasiaEctodermal dysplasiaEctrodactylyDermatologyPathologyGeneAnatomyGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the case of a boy with a clinical diagnosis of Goltz (focal dermal hypoplasia) syndrome. This is a rare genodermatosis characterized by widespread dysplasia of mesodermal and ectodermal tissues. It is inherited in an X-linked dominant fashion and is normally lethal in male patients. Mutations in the PORCN gene (Xp11.23), the proteins of which are key regulators in embryonic development, have been found to be responsible for the syndrome. Sequencing of the PORCN gene was negative in our patient. This case highlights some of the challenges of obtaining a molecular diagnosis in male patients with suspected Goltz syndrome in the clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralasian Journal of DermatologySame topicGenetic and rare skin diseases.French-language works237,207