MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1600686206

損害賠償 豫定額의 職權減額上 參酌의 基準時와 參酌 事由 - 부동산 매매계약에 있어서 ‘解除 후 時價의 變動’이 참작사유로 될 수 있는가? (대상판례 : 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2002다73852) -

2005· article· ko· W1600686206 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
김제완

Bibliographic record

Venue민사법학 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupreme courtReal estateDatabase transactionLawBusinessLaw and economicsPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is on the liquidated damage and the mitigation in Korean civil law. In a real estate sale transaction case in which a buyer made a breach of the contract but the seller resold it to the 3rd party so successfully that the seller recovered more than he lost, the Korean Supreme court held that the liquidated damage should be limited to 50% considering his recovery. The author is of opinion that the seller might recover the liquidate damage in full in spite of the fluctuation of the market price. The author is mentioning the duty of mitigation, the assessment of damage, the time of the assessment of damage in Canadian law and other related common law cases in a perspective of comparative legal studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue민사법학Same topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207