Expulsion of micronuclei containing amplified genes contributes to a decrease in double minute chromosomes from malignant tumor cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Double minute chromosomes (DMs) are a hallmark of gene amplification. The relationship between the formation of DMs and the amplification of DM-carried genes remains to be clarified. The human colorectal cancer cell line NCI-H716 and human malignant primitive neuroectodermal tumor cell line SK-PN-DW are known to contain many DMs. To examine the amplification of DM-carried genes in tumor cells, we performed Affymetrix SNP Array 6.0 analyses and verified the regions of amplification in NCI-H716 and SK-PN-DW tumor cells. We identified the amplification regions and the DM-carried genes that were amplified and overexpressed in tumor cells. Using RNA interference, we downregulated seven DM-carried genes, (NDUFB9, MTSS1, NSMCE2, TRIB1, FAM84B, MYC and FGFR2) individually and then investigated the formation of DMs, the amplification of the DM-carried genes, DNA damage and the physiological function of these genes. We found that suppressing the expression of DM-carried genes led to a decrease in the number of DMs and reduced the amplification of the DM-carried genes through the micronuclei expulsion of DMs from the tumor cells. We further detected an increase in the number of γH2AX foci in the knockdown cells, which provides a strong link between DNA damage and the loss of DMs. In addition, the loss of DMs and the reduced amplification and expression of the DM-carried genes resulted in a decrease in cell proliferation and invasion ability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".