MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601096581

Impulse noise hazard - What do we know about it?

2006· article· en· W1601096581 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alberto Behar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsInterface Biologics (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasilar membraneImpulse noiseImpulse (physics)AcousticsWaveformComputer scienceNoise (video)PhysicsTelecommunicationsAudiologyCochleaMedicineArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is no definition for impulse noise.It is generally ac cepted that its duration is o f less than 0.5s and that is sepa rated from other noises by more that 0.5s.If generated by col lision o f material bodies, it is called impact noise.Otherwise it can be generated by a sudden expansion/contraction o f the air due to a spark or an explosion.Although impulse noises are o f short rise time, the de cay time is a function of the acoustical environment: if in the open or in location with highly absorbent boundaries, it is also very short.However, in a reverberant location, such as most enclosed workplaces are, the decay time can be long enough as to blend with subsequent impulses in such a way that they are not separated in time and, as a result, they loose the impulse characteristic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207