MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601098493 · doi:10.2307/3341511

NAFTA and the Reconstruction of U.S. Hegemony: The Raw Materials Foundations of Economic Competitiveness

2001· article· en· W1601098493 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Paul S. Ciccantell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonySociologyPolitical economyEconomicsNeoclassical economicsEconomic geographyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: This paper argues that conflicting assessments of the of free trade in North America are incomplete because they do not analyse these effects in light of the key long term U.S. goal: the reconstruction of U.S. hegemony that was under siege by Japan and Europe. The declining competitiveness of U.S. raw materials supply systems badly damaged U.S. hegemony during the 1970s and l980s. The original U.S. strategy was to create a continental energy market to reduce overseas oil imports, guarantee access to oil and natural gas from Canada and Mexico, and reduce price instability. The evolution into broader agreements reflected the interests of other U.S. industries and the efforts of Canadian and Mexican states and firms to capture benefits from restructuring. This paper analyses the role continental integration of raw materials industries played in strategic efforts to reconstruct U.S. hegemony and the consequences of these efforts. Resume: Cet article argue du fait que les evaluations contradictoires des du libre-echange en Amerique du Nord sont inachevees parce qu'elles n'analysent pas ces effets a Ia lumiere du but principal des Etats-Unis de long terme: Ia reconstruction de l'hegemonie des Etats-Unis qui etait sous le siege par le Japon Ct J'Europe. La competitivite en baisse des circuits d'alimentation de matieres premieres premieres des Etats-Unis a mal endommage I'hegemnie des Etats-Unis pendant les annees 70 et les annees 80. La strategie initiate des Etats-Unis etait de creer un marche de I'energie continental pour neduire les importations de petrole d'outre-mer, I'acces de garantie au petrole et au gaz naturel du Canada et le Mexique, Ct reduit I'instabilite des prix. Levolution dans de plus larges accords a reflete les interets d'autres industries des Etats-Unis et les efforts des etats et des societes canadiens et mexicains aux avantages de saisie de Ia restructuration. Cet article analyse I' integration continentale de role des industries de mateieres premieres premieres jouees dans des efforts strategiques de reconstruire I'hegemonie des Etats-Unis et les consequences de ces efforts. I. Introduction What are the consequences of free trade agreements for North America? The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA) created the institutional framework for the integration of the economies of the United States, Canada and Mexico. Free trade supporters argued that the increased economic competitiveness resulting from continental integration of firm operations, access to lower cost labour, and enlarged markets would benefit all three nations, but critics emphasized the relocation of industries from the U.S. and Canada to Mexico in search of low wage labour and less stringent environmental regulations. Assessments of the of these agreements remain sharply divided (see, e.g., President's Report to Congress, 1997; USITC, 1997; and Weintraub, 1997 for positive assessments and Economic Policy Institute, 1997 for a negative assessment). In part, this results from focussing on different subsets of the total impacts of these agreements. More fundamentally, c onflicting assessments are incomplete because they do not analyse these in light of what this paper will argue are their key long term goals from the U.S. perspective: the reconstruction of U.S. hegemony that was under siege in the 1970s and 1980s by Japan and Europe. Labour costs, market access, and the economies of scale of continental operations are all central components of this hegemonic reconstruction strategy. This paper focuses attention on another central component: U.S. raw materials supply systems. A key factor in U.S. hegemonic decline was reliance on raw materials supply networks developed in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Declining competitiveness in extraction, processing, and particularly transport costs relative to its main competitors helped cause the productivity growth slowdown in the U. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207