Absolut x Adbusters: vínculos sociais da publicidade revelados pela antipublicidade
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste artigo é evidenciar alguns vínculos que a publicidade estabelece com o mundo social por meio do olhar tensionador da antipublicidade. Tomando por base autores como Stuart Hall e Michel Foucault, e através de uma análise sociossemiótica de anúncios da Absolut Vodka e dos spoof ads da ONG canadense Adbusters, procuramos evidenciar
 alguns dos modos pelos quais a masculinidade é uma representação socialmente compartilhada, tornando-se um elemento relevante a ser considerado na construção de campanhas publicitárias.
 Palavras-chave: Antipublicidade; publicidade; representações sociais.
 ABSTRACT
 The aim of this paper is to evidence the links which advertisements build with the social world from the questioning point of view of spoof ads. Based on authors such as Stuart Hall and Michel Foucault, and through a socio-
 semiotic analysis of Absolut Vodka ads and the spoof ads produced by Canadian NGO Adbusters, we try to highlight some of the ways in which masculinity is a socially shared representation, thus an important factor to be considered in the construction of advertising campaigns.
 Keywords: Spoof ads; advertisement; social representations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".