MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601131372 · doi:10.1002/9783527610341.ch7

Lubricants in the Environment

2006· other· en· W1601131372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLubricants and Their Additives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHazardous wasteHydraulic fluidLegislationEnvironmentally friendlyEnvironmental scienceWaste managementEnvironmental protectionEngineeringLawHydraulic machinery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Definition of ‘Environmentally Friendly Lubricants’ Current Situation Statistical Data Economic Consequences and Substitution Potential Agriculture, Economy, and Politics Political Initiatives Tests to Evaluate Biotic Potential Biodegradation Ecotoxicity Emission Thresholds Water Pollution The German Water Hazardous Classes German Regulations for Using Water-endangering Lubricants (VAwS) Environmental Legislation 1: Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (REACh) Registration Evaluation Authorization Registration Obligations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling (GHS) Environmental Legislation 2: Dangerous Preparations Directive (1999/45/EC) Environmental Legislation 3: Regular use Environmental Liability Law The Chemicals Law, Hazardous Substances Law Transport Regulations Disposal (Waste and Recycling Laws) Disposal Options for ‘Not water pollutant’ Vegetable Oils Environmental Legislation 4: Emissions Air Pollution Water Pollution German Law for Soil Protection German Water Law Waste Water Charges Clean Air: German Emissions Law Drinking Water Directive Standardization of Environmentally Compatible Hydraulic Fluids The German Regulation VDMA 24568 ISO Regulation 15380 Environmental Seal Global Eco-labeling Network European Eco-label The German ‘Blue Angel’ Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland) – ‘White Swan’ Requirements Concerning Renewable Resources Requirements Concerning Re-refined Oil Requirements Concerning Environmentally Harmful Components Requirements for Hydraulic Fluids, Mould Oil, Metalworking Fluids The Canadian ‘Environmental Choice’ (Maple Leaf) Other Eco-labels Austria France Japan USA The Netherlands Base Fluids Biodegradable Base Oils for Lubricants Synthetic Esters Polyglycols Polyalphaolefins Relevant Properties of Ester Oils Evaporation Loss Viscosity–Temperature Behavior Boundary Lubrication Additives Extreme Pressure/Antiwear Additives Corrosion Protection Antioxidants Products (Examples) Hydraulic Fluids Metal Working Oil Oil-refreshing System Safety Aspects of Handling Lubricants (Working Materials) Toxicological Terminology and Hazard Indicators Acute Toxicity Subchronic and Chronic Toxicity Poison Categories Corrosive, Caustic Explosion and Flammability Carcinogenic Teratogens, Mutagens MAK (Maximum Workplace Concentration) Values Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAK, PAH, PCA) Nitrosamines in Cutting Fluids Law on Flammable Fluids Skin Problems Caused by Lubricants Structure and Function of the Skin Skin Damage Oil Acne (Particle Acne) Oil Eczema Testing Skin Compatibility Skin Function Tests Skin Care and Skin Protection

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLubricants and Their AdditivesFrench-language works237,207