Interpretación de gráficas cartesianas sobre el movimiento desde el punto de vista de la teoría de la objetivación
Bibliographic record
Abstract
de la teoría de la objetivación Isaías Miranda, Luis Radford y José Guzmán Resumen: En este artículo se analiza el proceso de producción de significados relacionado con la interpretación de una gráfica cartesiana sobre el movimiento de dos objetos (movimiento relativo).El análisis, centrado en el trabajo realizado por un grupo de tres alumnos de grado 10 (15-16 años) en una lección regular de matemáticas, es conducido dentro del marco de la teoría de la objetivación.De acuerdo con dicha teoría, los procesos de producción de significados se investigan a través de la interacción discursiva y la movilización de signos y artefactos que hacen los estudiantes.El aprendizaje del contenido conceptual en cuestión es visto como un proceso social de aproximación de significados subjetivos o personales a los significados histórico-culturales plasmados en la compleja semiótica del plano cartesiano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".