MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hepcidin is cytotoxic to myeloma cells (P1337)

2013· article· en· W160132122 on OpenAlexaff
David Conrad, Melanie Power Coombs, Ashley L. Hilchie, Tyler Zemlak, Carolyn D. Doucette, David W. Hoskin, Robert Liwski

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDalhousie UniversityHealth Sciences CentreCapital District Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHepcidinMultiple myelomaInnate immune systemCytotoxic T cellCytotoxicityImmune systemChemistryBiologyCancer researchImmunologyInflammationIn vitroBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent studies suggest that some cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) contribute to innate anticancer immunity. Hepcidin is a CAP and acute phase reactant well known for its antibacterial properties and its role in iron homeostasis. No anticancer function has yet been assigned to hepcidin, although elevated hepcidin levels are found in patients with hematologic malignancies, including plasma cell myeloma. We therefore investigated the anticancer properties of hepcidin against myeloma cells in vitro. A hepcidin isoform lacking the iron-regulatory domain was used. Hepcidin toxicity was assessed by MTT survival assays and DNA fragmentation tests. Propidium iodide (PI) staining was used to measure plasma membrane damage, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to visualize cellular membrane changes. Hepcidin impaired the survival of mouse and human myeloma cells and induced DNA fragmentation, suggesting that cytotoxicity may be due to apoptosis. Hepcidin caused substantial PI uptake in the myeloma cells, and SEM confirmed that hepcidin treatment resulted in cellular membrane pore formation. Interestingly, hepcidin was more toxic to melphalan-resistant myeloma cells than to melphalan-sensitive controls. Our data implicate a role for hepcidin in innate immunity against plasma cell myeloma. Further studies on the anticancer properties of hepcidin are warranted in order to fully understand its physiological role in the context of neoplastic disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→