MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601447128 · doi:10.1029/2010gl043219

Deepest mantle viscosity: Constraints from Earth rotation anomalies

2010· article· en· W1601447128 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. Peltier, R. Drummond

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyMantle (geology)Post-glacial reboundGeophysicsEarth's rotationPolarInner coreViscosityGeodesyGlacial periodPhysicsPaleontologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radial variation of viscosity from Earth's surface to the core‐mantle boundary is most accurately determined on the basis of observations related to the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) process. Beneath a depth of approximately 1250 km the primary constraints available pertain to the anomalies in Earth's rotational state that have previously been shown to be intimately linked to the same GIA process responsible for postglacial sea level variability. It is demonstrated that these anomalies are capable of resolving a difference between D″ viscosity and that of the overlying region which extends upwards to the 1250 km depth horizon. A “trade‐off” is shown to exist between the viscosities in these deepest mantle layers that may be resolved by the observed direction of true polar wander.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207