MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601457539 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2001.966018

The conditional metric merge algorithm for maximum likelihood multiuser-macrodiversity detection

2002· article· en· W1601457539 on OpenAlexaff
L. Welburn, J.K. Cavers, K.W. Sowerby

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMerge (version control)Viterbi algorithmComputer scienceMultiuser detectionAlgorithmDetectorBit error rateMetric (unit)Decoding methodsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combination of macrodiversity reception with maximum likelihood (ML) multiuser detection has the capability to reduce the bit error rate (BER) for many users by several orders of magnitude compared with multiuser detectors that operate on each antenna separately. In this paper, we present the conditional metric merge (CMM) algorithm which reduces the computational complexity of the ML multiuser-macrodiversity detector by an enormous factor. The CMM algorithm can be viewed as a spatial variant of the Viterbi algorithm. It is a new algorithm and is the first of its kind as ML multiuser-macrodiversity detection (MUMD) is a relatively new area of research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207