MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601497297

Margaret Laurence’s A Jest of God as a Work of Simultaneous Narration

2008· article· en· W1601497297 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Isla Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Canadian Literature · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePolyphonyConceptualizationLiteraturePresentation (obstetrics)PhilosophyArtPsychoanalysisHistoryPsychologyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical reception of Margaret Laurence's narrative technique in A Jest of God (1966) has been divided, centring on the present-tense, first-person point of view of protagonist Rachel Cameron. Advances in narratological theory since the novel's publication – especially Dorrit Cohn's conceptualization of simultaneous narration – facilitates a more refined study. Simultaneous narration combines the mimeticism of first-person fiction and the diegetic norms of verisimilar psychological presentation that mark the tradition of third-person realist fiction. The use of simultaneous narration, along with the creation of what Mikhail Bakhtin calls true polyphony, reveals Laurence's novel as narratologically forward-looking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Canadian LiteratureSame topicNarrative Theory and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207