MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601631221 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2005.1512956

A context-sensitive incremental learning paradigm of an ubiquitous multimodal multimedia computing system

2006· article· en· W1601631221 on OpenAlexaff
Manolo Dulva Hina, Amar Ramdane-Chérif, Chakib Tadj

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUbiquitous computingHuman–computer interactionContext (archaeology)Ambient intelligenceTask (project management)ModalitiesUbiquitous robotContext awarenessContext-aware pervasive systemsMultimediaMobile deviceIntelligent environmentUser modelingArtificial intelligenceUser interfaceWorld Wide WebEmbedded systemRobot learningOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we proposed a context-sensitive incremental learning paradigm of an ubiquitous multimodal multimedia computing system. An ubiquitous computing environment supports a busy and mobile user's need of being able to work on his task anytime and anywhere he wants. Along with user's data (his profile, task, and application registry) the machine-acquired intelligence needs to be transported as well in order that the user could continue working on an intelligent environment. Machine intelligence is acquired through incremental learning. In a context-sensitive environment that has a rich selection of modalities and media for data input and output, an intelligent computing system could determine the I/O devices appropriate for the user's setting after considering the user's location, the noise level in the environment, and the presence or absence of other people in the vicinity. Every new setting (pre-condition scenario) produces a new I/O devices configuration (post-condition scenario) suited for the setting; each new scenario knowledge gets stored onto knowledge database. Overtime, the machine would have enough knowledge to deal with whatever context scenario that comes up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207