MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601661161 · doi:10.1002/0470009403.ch5

Equilibrium Electrode Potential

2005· other· en· W1601661161 on OpenAlexaff
Milan Paunović, Mordechay Schlesinger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNernst equationStandard electrode potentialElectrodeReference electrodeAbsolute electrode potentialStandard hydrogen electrodeElectrode potentialVoltageAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Cell Voltage and Electrode Potentials Concentration Dependence of Equilibrium Cell Voltage: The General Nernst Equation Metal/Metal-Ion (M/MZ+) Potentials REDOX Potentials Measurement of Equilibrium Electrode Potentials Standard Electrode Potentials Concentration and Activity References and Further Reading Problems

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.280

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207