MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601766900 · doi:10.4000/rsa.243

Pluralité dans l’établissement de la filiation au Québec

2010· article· fr· W1601766900 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie–Blanche Tahon

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociologiques et anthropologiques · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis trente ans, le Québec connaît une législation innovante en matière de droit de la famille. La première partie de cet article retrace l’évolution de cette législation selon une approche chronologique ; elle met en lumière certains indices suggérant que le législateur, en fournissant des réponses ponctuelles à des demandes légitimes, fait émerger diverses catégories de citoyens. Cette émergence est aussi confortée par la confusion existant entre “filiation” et “parentalité”. Dans une deuxième partie sont examinées deux positions contenues dans un avis de la Commission de l’éthique de la science et de la technologie, qui, si elles sont susceptibles d’éclairer partiellement quelques spécificités québécoises, corrigent malaisément des asymétries entre des catégories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.021
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociologiques et anthropologiquesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207