MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602001262 · doi:10.4401/ag-4589

On amplitudes of P near the shadow zone

2010· article· en· W1602001262 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Geophysics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudeGeologySeismologyGeodesyMantle (geology)Variation (astronomy)PhysicsGeophysicsOpticsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

51 short-period vertical North American and Canadian records of the Samoa earthquake 14 April 1957 were examined. Amplitudes of P were very large at the western stations (Δ < 84˚) and small at the stations to the east, 8 of which recorded P at distances greater than 100˚. There was a lack of stations at intermediate distances. At the greatest distance, 108˚.2, the P waves were not diffracted waves, for the phase had the same general character as at shorter distances; the period was 2 sec. From 70˚ to about 90˚ the Samoa P timedistance curve is steeper than the Jeffreys-Bullen curve. It had been found previously that from about 90˚ epicentral distance onwards the variation ot the P amplitude with distance was not always the same and also that the shadow zone seemed to begin at different distances. It is suggested that this be due to small regional differences of velocity in the deepest layer D" of the mantle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it