MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602127885

Developing a Strategic Negotiation Plan: Toyota Highlander

2007· article· en· W1602127885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael R. Luthy, Mike H. Ryan, Bettye R. Desselle, John T. Byrd

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Academy of Case Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDiverse Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationPurchasingContext (archaeology)MarketingClass (philosophy)The InternetPlan (archaeology)AdvertisingBusinessPublic relationsPsychologySociologyComputer sciencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CASE DESCRIPTION primary subject matter of this case concerns the evaluation of gathered information to develop a negotiation plan prior to a consumer's purchase of a sport utility vehicle. Secondary issues examined include the sales process and the increasing role of the Internet in consumers' information search activities. case has a difficulty level of one (appropriate for freshman level courses) although it may be used through level five (appropriate for first year graduate level) depending on the amount and complexity of background reading assigned. case is designed to be taught in as little as one class hour, but may be expanded to as many as three class hours depending on the amount of theoretical material discussed by the instructor, if role-play negotiations are carried out, and whether any out-of-class preparations are assigned. case is expected to require from zero to approximately four hours of outside preparation by students. CASE SYNOPSIS Introducing students to the topic of sales negotiation is always challenging. While it is typically a significant part of business-to-business purchases and many higher-ticket priced consumer goods, negative word-of-mouth and uncomfortable personal experiences leave many students apprehensive. Presenting the topic in the context of purchasing an automobile, or in this case study, negotiating the purchase of two sport utility vehicles, students will draw on their own experiences, those of their friends and family members, and any assigned readings. overall goals of the case are to defuse the anxiety many students associate with negotiation, underscore the importance of analysis and planning prior to face-to-face encounters, and better prepare students for future business and personal purchase situations where negotiation is a factor. Specifically, in this case students examine collected price and non-price information, and develop a negotiation plan. Through this task the instructor may explore various fundamental aspects of negotiation (e.g., agenda analysis, concession strategies) and the distributive bargaining model (e.g., aspiration targets, reservation points, buyer and seller surplus). INTRODUCTION As Michelle Tipton read through the brochure for what seemed the tenth time she found herself nodding in agreement. The new Highlander. An unexpected bit of comfort in the rugged world of the SUV. Breaking new ground is nothing new to Toyota, but this time around, we've built a vehicle that boldly redefines everything you've come to expect from a sport utility vehicle. Highlander gives you uncommon comfort and unparalleled smoothness in an unmistakable form. It's designed for those drivers who crave the versatility and space of an SUV, but aren't willing to sacrifice a refined, comfortable ride. With exceptionally smooth handling, clean, unique styling and a spacious interior, Highlander is the civilized ride you've been looking for. (Toyota Internet Website and Highlander brochure). After months of investigating, Michelle knew that this was the vehicle she wanted. Sifting through piles of Car and Driver, Auto Week, and Consumer Reports magazines, visiting websites for Acura, Subaru, BMW, and Honda brands among others, convinced her that this was the vehicle for her. Now the question was how to get the best deal from one of the local Toyota dealerships in the Louisville metropolitan area. Located in the city were Toyota of Louisville and Oxmoor Toyota. Just across the river in Southern Indiana was Green Tree Toyota. Because of negative comments and stories she had heard about Oxmoor Toyota, Michelle decided to limit her dealership choice to either Toyota of Louisville or Green Tree Toyota. An unexpected twist in Michelle's deliberations came when one of her colleagues at work, Ashley Lacey, dropped by her office one day and told her that she and her husband Robert were also looking for a new sport utility vehicle for their family, which included their nine year-old daughter Alex and one good size Labrador retriever. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International Academy of Case StudiesSame topicDiverse Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207