MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W160216750

Effective Principals in Action: Learning Should Be at the Center of a School Leader's Job, with Good Principals Shaping the Course of the School from Inside the Classroom and outside the Office

2013· article· en· W160216750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhi Delta Kappan · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticePrincipal (computer security)AttendanceMathematics educationAsideDowntownPsychologyPedagogyCurriculumSociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Walk into a great school and you'll see the imprint of a great principal. Here's what you might notice: A colorful banner in the entrance that sums up a vision for the school that all children can succeed. The prominent chart on a wall near the office details student attendance by grade, class, and, in the case of students who haven't missed a day, by name -- one small indicator of how the uses data. Throughout the hallways, you'll get hints of the principal's efforts to focus the whole school community on learning: here a bulletin board keeping track of how many books the children have read so far this year in their spare time, there a bulletin board where the parent-teacher group offers tips to parents on homework completion. And then, there's what you'll hear through open classroom doors: engaging lessons, a sign of the first-rate instruction that has emerged from talented teachers working under the guidance of a school leader who observes and coaches them so they get even better. This is not your 1960's school, and it's not your 1960's principal. Once, principals focused mostly on the Bs -- buses, boilers, and books -- managing the staff, creating rules and procedures, making sure the school was operating smoothly (Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, & Anderson, 2010). Lip service may have been paid to the principal's role in boosting instruction -- was originally meant to describe the principal teacher -- but principals were largely removed from the world of the classroom. Now, educators and policy makers increasingly accept that learning should be at the center of a school leader's job and that a good participates in the life of the school, more often than not shaping its course from inside the classroom and outside the office. Yes, good principals are good administrators. But most important, they are instructional leaders, providing staff with guidance and a sense of mission and students with the motivation to succeed. Evolving role: Principal as instructional leader The ways schools were managed began to shift in the 1970s, as influential studies showed that effective schools are characterized by a learning-oriented culture. Still, the idea that principals should focus sharply on teaching and learning did not emerge prominently until later, when educators and policy makers became persuaded that school matters to student achievement. Their views were borne out in 2010, in Learning from Leadership (Louis et al., 2010), the largest study to date looking at the effect of on student achievement. The report, written by researchers at the Universities of Minnesota and Toronto, confirmed that next to classroom instruction, is the most important school-related influence on student learning. To date, the report says, we have not found a single case of a school improving its student achievement record in the absence of talented leadership (p. 9). What makes crucial? While most school considered separately, have small effects on learning, good can pull the pieces together. To obtain large effects, educators need to create across the relevant variables, the report says. Among all the parents, teachers, and policy makers who work hard to improve education, educators in positions are uniquely well-positioned to ensure the necessary synergy (p. 9). In a dozen years of working with states, districts, researchers, and others, the Wallace Foundation (which supported the Minnesota-Toronto study) has tried to identify what makes that possible. A report published in 2012 by Wallace, The School Principal as Leader, pinpointed five key practices of effective principals. This article delves into each practice, offering snapshots of dynamic principals, many from districts where Wallace has supported projects, and demonstrating the power and promise of strong school leadership. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it