MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W160216750

Effective Principals in Action: Learning Should Be at the Center of a School Leader's Job, with Good Principals Shaping the Course of the School from Inside the Classroom and outside the Office

2013· article· en· W160216750 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jody Spiro

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhi Delta Kappan · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNoticePrincipal (computer security)AttendanceMathematics educationAsideDowntownPsychologyPedagogyCurriculumSociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Walk into a great school and you'll see the imprint of a great principal. Here's what you might notice: A colorful banner in the entrance that sums up a vision for the school that all children can succeed. The prominent chart on a wall near the office details student attendance by grade, class, and, in the case of students who haven't missed a day, by name -- one small indicator of how the uses data. Throughout the hallways, you'll get hints of the principal's efforts to focus the whole school community on learning: here a bulletin board keeping track of how many books the children have read so far this year in their spare time, there a bulletin board where the parent-teacher group offers tips to parents on homework completion. And then, there's what you'll hear through open classroom doors: engaging lessons, a sign of the first-rate instruction that has emerged from talented teachers working under the guidance of a school leader who observes and coaches them so they get even better. This is not your 1960's school, and it's not your 1960's principal. Once, principals focused mostly on the Bs -- buses, boilers, and books -- managing the staff, creating rules and procedures, making sure the school was operating smoothly (Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, & Anderson, 2010). Lip service may have been paid to the principal's role in boosting instruction -- was originally meant to describe the principal teacher -- but principals were largely removed from the world of the classroom. Now, educators and policy makers increasingly accept that learning should be at the center of a school leader's job and that a good participates in the life of the school, more often than not shaping its course from inside the classroom and outside the office. Yes, good principals are good administrators. But most important, they are instructional leaders, providing staff with guidance and a sense of mission and students with the motivation to succeed. Evolving role: Principal as instructional leader The ways schools were managed began to shift in the 1970s, as influential studies showed that effective schools are characterized by a learning-oriented culture. Still, the idea that principals should focus sharply on teaching and learning did not emerge prominently until later, when educators and policy makers became persuaded that school matters to student achievement. Their views were borne out in 2010, in Learning from Leadership (Louis et al., 2010), the largest study to date looking at the effect of on student achievement. The report, written by researchers at the Universities of Minnesota and Toronto, confirmed that next to classroom instruction, is the most important school-related influence on student learning. To date, the report says, we have not found a single case of a school improving its student achievement record in the absence of talented leadership (p. 9). What makes crucial? While most school considered separately, have small effects on learning, good can pull the pieces together. To obtain large effects, educators need to create across the relevant variables, the report says. Among all the parents, teachers, and policy makers who work hard to improve education, educators in positions are uniquely well-positioned to ensure the necessary synergy (p. 9). In a dozen years of working with states, districts, researchers, and others, the Wallace Foundation (which supported the Minnesota-Toronto study) has tried to identify what makes that possible. A report published in 2012 by Wallace, The School Principal as Leader, pinpointed five key practices of effective principals. This article delves into each practice, offering snapshots of dynamic principals, many from districts where Wallace has supported projects, and demonstrating the power and promise of strong school leadership. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,063

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0190,015
Communication savante0,0170,016
Science ouverte0,0020,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,016

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,172
Tête enseignante GPT0,380
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhi Delta KappanMême sujetTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesTravaux en français237 207