Inmigración y educación intercultural en Québec : programas y debates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo, marcado por una perspectiva de comparación implícita, presenta una infonnación descriptiva del estado de los programas y debates que conciernen las medidas educativas\n adoptadas en favor de la integración de los inmigrantes y de la educación intercultural en Québec. Éste describe el contexto general dentro del cual se insertan las cuestiones de educación y de\n inmigración en Québec, los diferentes programas creados para favorecer la integración escolar de los alumnos de origen inmigrante y discute asimismo sobre algunos debates que conciernen diversas\n opciones de políticas y programas en este área. En conclusión, la autora propone una reflexión comparativa sobre el esclarecimiento que el caso quebequense es susceptible de aportar a la situación\n vivida en ciertos estados autónomos de España, sobre todo a aquellos donde la lengua propia no es el castellano.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".