MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602298436

3D modeling of active pixel sensor with microlens

2011· article· en· W1602298436 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanzhang Xiao, Z. M. Simon Li, Kazutake UEHARA, Michel Lestrade, Z. Q. Li

Bibliographic record

Venue17th Microopics Conference (MOC) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsCrosslight Software (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrolensPixelSensitivity (control systems)Image sensorAperture (computer memory)OpticsCMOS sensorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringAcousticsLens (geology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three dimensional modeling of active pixel sensor with microlens is reported by using an advanced drift-diffusion simulator together with finite difference time domain method for optical effect in this work. The opto-electronic responses are presented versus various power intensity and illumination wavelength. The aperture size of the isolated metal layer is also discussed. Whereas microlens is shown to improve the sensitivity, the aperture size of the isolated metal layer should be optimized to avoid sensitivity loss. The presented results demonstrate a methodological and technical capability for 3D modeling optimization of complex CMOS image sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue17th Microopics Conference (MOC)Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207