MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602365172 · doi:10.1163/156854002760202651

OCCURRENCE OF CYMBASOMA RIGIDUM THOMPSON, 1888 (COPEPODA, MONSTRILLOIDA) IN ESTUARIES OF THE SOUTHERN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE, CANADA

2002· article· en· W1602365172 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCrustaceana · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryCarcinologyGeographyZooplanktonLolium rigidumEcologyOceanographyBiologyCrustaceanGeologyDecapoda

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three female specimens of C. rigidum were found in zooplankton samples from the Kouchibouguac and East River Estuaries in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence, representing a new record for the northwest Atlantic. The geographic distribution of other monstrilloids in the northwest Atlantic and Arctic are also summarized. Variations in morphological characters were found between C. rigidum females found in the latter estuaries and those of C. rigidum Thompson, 1888 and are discussed herein. Trois specimens femelles du monstrilloide C. rigidum ont ete trouves dans des echantillons de zooplancton collectes dans les estuaires des rivieres Kouchibouguac et East, situees dans le sud du Golfe St. Laurent. La presence de ces femelles dans ces estuaires represente un nouveau signalement pour le nord-ouest de l'Atlantique. Un sommaire de la repartition geographique des monstrilloides dans le nord-ouest de l'Atlantique et l'Arctique est presente. Les differences morphologiques entre les specimens femelles de C. rigidum retrouves dans ces estuaires et le specimen-type femelle de C. rigidum Thompson, 1888 y sont discutees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrustaceanaSame topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207