MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602396897 · doi:10.7202/1012351ar

Francis Poulenc et la danse

2012· article· fr· W1602396897 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hervé Lacombe

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesEthnologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La danse constitue un axe important de la production de Poulenc et un modèle essentiel de son style, axe qu’il convient d’examiner globalement. Les références explicites (dans les titres) ou implicites aux danses irriguent toute son oeuvre, en dehors même des ballets, et contribuent à créer un imaginaire de la danse, lié à ses lectures et à ses souvenirs. Les danses populaires urbaines et les danses anciennes s’inscrivent logiquement dans l’esthétique néoclassique et permettent la constitution d’un « folklore personnel ». Le cas exemplaire des Biches , partition composée pour les Ballets russes de Diaghilev, permet à Poulenc de déployer sa propre poétique fondée sur une relation étroite nouant musique, danse et programme intime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musiqueSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207