Regles relatives a la retraite obligatoire et decisions de retraite des professeurs d'universite au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les distributions selon l'age des professeurs dans les universites canadiennes ou la retraite n'est pas obligatoire et dans celles ou la retraite est obligatoire a 65 ans different au fil du temps, une plus forte proportion plus de professeurs de plus de 65 ans enseignant dans les universites ou la retraite n'est pas obligatoire. Une analyse d'un modele de risque en temps discret montre que les membres du corps professoral dans les universites ou la retraite est obligatoire a 65 ans ont des taux de depart a 65 ans qui sont de 30 a 35 points superieurs a ceux de leurs homologues dans les universites ou la retraite n'est pas obligatoire. Les resultats pour les hommes et les femmes sont comparables; toutefois, la grandeur de l'effet est un peu plus petite dans le cas des femmes. Ce resultat n'appuie pas l'hypothese selon laquelle la retraite obligatoire a un effet plus contraignant sur le comportement des professeurs de sexe feminin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".