MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602562945 · doi:10.4000/rh19.721

David Wright, Mental disability in Victorian England. The Earlswood asylum 1847-1901, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001. 244 p.

2004· article· en· W1602562945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicole Edelman

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d histoire du XIXe siècle · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrightMedia studiesGerontologyHistorySociologyArt historyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce livre, écrit par David Wright, professeur d’histoire de la médecine à l’Université Mc Master (Canada), est issu d’une thèse de doctorat ayant pour thème Earlswood, le premier asile pour « idiots » des pays anglo-saxons. C’est dans cet établissement charitable, situé au sud-ouest de Londres, que fut effectuée la découverte de la trisomie (« mongolisme ») par John Langdon Down (« Down’s syndrome »). Mental disability in Victorian England s’appuie sur des sources nombreuses, dont les archives...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d histoire du XIXe siècleSame topicHistorical Psychiatry and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207