MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mentoring for professional development and the future of nutrition and dietetics

2010· article· en· W1602614896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Palermo

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition & Dietetics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccreditationProfessional developmentMedical educationCompetence (human resources)MedicineNursingPromotion (chess)PsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mentoring, a supportive and reciprocal learning relationship, is widely recognised across many professions as a professional development tool.1-3 The profession of nutrition and dietetics in Australia values the role mentoring plays in professional development evidenced through the Accredited Practising Dietitian programme.4 Mentoring is a potentially powerful tool for practitioners and researchers. Mentoring appears to have the potential to develop skills, instill confidence and support achievement of professional goals and career directions.3, 5 Mentoring has been recognised as an important strategy to develop the profession of dietetics in Australia,6 America,7 Canada8 and South Africa.9 While the potential value and role of mentoring as contributing to practice improvement has been proposed, there is limited evidence on its effectiveness and outcomes. A recent study investigating the experience and effect of mentoring on professional development in the field of public health and community nutrition identified that mentoring improved confidence, competence (by 15%), enhanced professional support networks and increased capacity for public health nutrition.10 This is the only published study that has attempted to measure the effect and outcomes of mentoring in nutrition and dietetics. The present study identified that the key elements to the success of the mentoring intervention was the attributes and characteristics of the mentor and the mentoring circle format. It also identified the challenges in measuring the effectiveness and outcomes of mentoring programmes. The important attributes of the mentor identified in the present study included having experience in and a passion for the field of practice, facilitating a trusting relationship and providing effective feedback.10 These attributes are supported in the wider literature as important characteristics of the mentor and mentoring relationship. The mentor is a role model who promotes independence, encourages and motivates and is responsible for guiding their mentee through professional circles.11 The mentee also has a key role in determining the direction of the relationship and identifying outcomes.1 The mentoring relationship is based on reciprocity, trust and confidentiality whereby objectivity is maintained and equality promoted.11 The role of the mentor is to support the design of professional development plans, through active listening and asking questions. The mentee must commit to mentoring and driving their own professional development, accept feedback and take responsibility for their learning and development.1, 5, 11, 12 It is important for individuals in our profession to examine their skills as a mentor and advocate for the important role mentoring plays in professional development. While mentoring has traditionally been in the form of a more junior professional being placed with a senior experienced colleague, today peer and group mentoring models are described to increase efficiency and reduce mentor burden, and both formal and informal relationships are recognised.5 Mentoring circles, whereby a group of colleagues form together to support each other learn,13 create a safe and supportive environment for learning in my study.10 Having small groups made up of practitioners with similar roles and levels of experience creates a safe environment for learning. The confidentiality of the group and sharing between peers are also important for learning. As one person cannot provide all the relevant skills and experience throughout a career, multiple mentors may be utlised.14 The nutrition and dietetics profession must seek to acknowledge alternative forms of mentoring, including group formats, peer mentoring and the traditional one-to-one mentoring. We have a profession that is ripe for mentoring. We are at the edge of key research findings and innovative practice and have a business, food and nutrition, that is central to political debates across government, for example, obesity and environmental change. Mentoring has played a role in achieving our current success as a developing profession.14 It is through continued mentoring of our novices, through to our experts, which will enable us to achieve our goals. We must also rise to the challenge of measuring the effectiveness of mentoring relationships. The difficulties of measuring mentoring effectiveness have been acknowledged.15 The positivist paradigm offers little scope in measuring mentoring effectiveness.16, 17 It is generally not practical or ethical to randomise professionals to educational interventions, such as mentoring;16, 18 however, we need to learn from other innovative professional development endeavours, such as inter-professional education,19 and aim to measure the effect of mentoring practitioners on the health of the populations we serve. Qualitative and mixed-methodologies offer an approach to appropriately answer our questions in educational research.17 Using qualitative criteria has been suggested as a way to monitor the effect of mentoring.15 Portfolios offer a potential avenue for measurement of professional development. Portfolios are a collection of material that provide evidence of learning and identify future learning needs and opportunities.20, 21 Portfolios can be reliably used for assessment when qualitative assessment methodologies are applied.20 In the context of mentoring, assessment should be conducted independently to not affect the relationship. Portfolios could be considered as part of the mentoring package for our profession into the future. Mentoring is a potentially powerful experience for the nutrition and dietetics workforce. Mentoring may be viewed as part of a multi-strategy approach to workforce development that facilitates reflective practice in combination with workplace experience. The profession of nutrition and dietetics should embrace mentoring as a key element for continued success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition & DieteticsSame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207