MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1602777363 · doi:10.7202/001622ar

Éducation, qualification professionnelle et carrière au Québec

2002· article· fr· W1602777363 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean Renaud, Paul Bernard, Monique Berthiaume

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La qualification professionnelle, lien immédiat entre l'école et le travail, a été l'un des objets privilégiés des réformes de l'éducation au Québec. Rarement cependant, a-t-on tenté d'évaluer de façon globale son impact sur l'accès à l'univers des emplois et, plus généralement, sur la carrière des travailleurs. Cet article en présente précisément une analyse empirique pour le Québec. Après avoir discuté de la notion polymorphe qu'est la qualification professionnelle pour en dégager une mesure empirique universelle, les auteurs procèdent à une analyse en deux volets. En premier lieu, ils tentent d'évaluer, chiffres à l'appui, les thèses opposées de la qualification et de la déquali-ficatiori des emplois. En deuxième lieu est présenté un modèle de cheminement de la causalité liant le:s variables scolaires (formation générale et formation professionnelle) à la qualification exercée dans l'emploi, au statut socio-économique et au revenu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.497
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.052 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétés→Same topicSocial Sciences and Governance→French-language works237,207→