Les personnes sans abri et le football : entre pratique sportive et accompagnement social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les modes de prise en charge des sans-abri montrent aujourd’hui leurs limites, en raison du nombre croissant de personnes exclues, de la complexité de leurs problèmes et de l’accumulation des symptômes physiques et psychiques dont elles souffrent. L’expérience de la Coupe du monde de football des personnes sans abri, qui s’est déroulée en France en 2011, a mis en exergue le travail de promotion du sport par les associations françaises de lutte contre l‘exclusion. À côté du travail social qui promeut une prise en charge individuelle, une autre pratique « hors les murs » autour du football se développe et nourrit une réflexion autour de notions clés comme le corps, la santé, l’accompagnement collectif, la relation de confiance, la participation des usagers... Cet article invite à rencontrer un public mal connu et souligne les espoirs que suscite la rencontre du sport et de l’insertion pour la réalisation du projet de vie des personnes exclues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".