Bibliographic record
Abstract
La antropologia ha sido pionera en la utilizacion de la fotografia v el cine documental en la investigacion social.Desde los registros fotograficos de Franz Boas con los Kwakiutl, en el norte de Vancouver (Canada) en 1897, y el documental sobre la Cmubridgc Anthropological Expcciitimi al Estrecho de Torres, dirigida por A. Haddon en 1899, hasta nuestros dias, la produccion audiovisual ha luchado por su reconocimiento disciplinario.En este articulo seran abordadas ciertas modalidades v transformaciones de la representacion visual, articulando paradigmas cientificos y procesos sociales.Se reflexionara sobre las formas en que los productos audiovisuales informan del objeto de la investigacion, el rol de las técnicas irto y cinematograficas al interior del proceso de investigacion y los factores socio-poliricos que inciden. AiasnucrThe antropologv has been pioneer in the utilization of photography and documentarv film in social research.From the Franz Boas with the Kwakiutl photographical register, in 1897, at the North of Vancouver (Canada), and the documentarv film about Cambridge Anthropological Expedition at Strait Towers, of A. Haddon in 1899, to this moment, audiovisual production has been fightmg for a disciplinary recognition.ln this article there'll be an approach to some visual representations modalities and tranformations.comparing scientifics paradigms and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".