MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602826511 · doi:10.34096/runa.v25i1.1260

Representaciones visuales y procesos sociales en antropología

2005· article· es· W1602826511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susana Sel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La antropología ha sido pionera en la utilización de la fotografía y el cine documental en la investigación social. Desde los registros fotográficos de Franz Boas con los Kwakiutl, en el norte de Vancouver (Canada) en 1897, y el documental sobre la Cambridge Anthropological Expedition al Estrecho de Torres, dirigida por A. Haddon en 1899, hasta nuestros días, la producción audiovisual ha luchado por su reconocimiento disciplinario. En este artículo serán abordadas ciertas modalidades v transformaciones de la representación visual, articulando paradigmas científicos y procesos sociales. Se reflexionara sobre las formas en que los productos audiovisuales informan del objeto de la investigación, el rol de las técnicas foto y cinematográficas al interior del proceso de investigación y los factores socio-políticos que inciden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.317
GPT teacher head0.579
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207