MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602890039

Els comptes de Santa Clara de 1420 a 1427. Una eina més per conèixer la vida monàstica del segle XV

2013· article· ca· W1602890039 on OpenAlexaff
Jill R. Webster

Bibliographic record

VenueAusa · 2013
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Iberia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El monestir de Santa Clara va ser molt important en la vida de Vic a l’edat mitjana, pero els comptes del segle xv tenen un interes especial ja que avui dia els remeis naturals han tornat a ser populars. Algunes de les herbes mencionades han canviat de nom, o no estan disponibles avui. Aquestes pagines expliquen breument el significat d’aquest aspecte, pero tambe refereixen a la dieta diaria de les monges, principalment, ens sembla, treta de les seves propies terres, o en el cas del peix, de rius no massa llunyans. Tambe es una breu introduccio als llibres de comptes del segle xv que contenen aquests i molts altres aspectes de la vida monastica de Vic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAusaSame topicMedieval and Early Modern IberiaFrench-language works237,207