MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602909623 · doi:10.2979/vic.2007.49.3.543

<i>Thomas Hardy: The Time-Torn Man</i>, by Claire Tomalin and<i>Thomas Hardy Reappraised: Essays in Honour of Michael Millgate</i>, edited by Keith Wilson

2007· article· en· W1602909623 on OpenAlex
Andrew Radford

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonourWifeBiographyNarrativeClassicsPerformance artArt historyHistoryArtPhilosophyTheologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Thomas Hardy: The Time-Torn Man, and: Thomas Hardy Reappraised: Essays in Honour of Michael Millgate Andrew Radford (bio) Thomas Hardy: The Time-Torn Man, by Claire Tomalin; pp. xxv + 486. Harmondsworth and New York: Viking Penguin, 2006, £25.00, $35.00. Thomas Hardy Reappraised: Essays in Honour of Michael Millgate, edited by Keith Wilson; pp. xxiii + 304. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press, 2006, £40.00, $65.00. In her new biography of Thomas Hardy, Claire Tomalin suggests that "reading Jude is like being hit in the face over and over again" (254). These remarks, while evoking the novel's harrowing bleakness, also capture the fraught and stinging experience of reading one of Tomalin's more prolix precursors. Martin Seymour-Smith's wildly eccentric Hardy (1994), for example, dedicated much of its immense length to contesting, with blunt fury, Michael Millgate's definitive authority. The index to Seymour-Smith's truculent tome lists about eighty references to Millgate, while Hardy's first wife Emma garners only sixty-eight and second wife Florence a meagre thirty-one. As if conscious of Seymour-Smith's raucously indecorous chronicle, Tomalin adroitly distils her own account into less than 400 pages. She eschews startling disclosures and bruising attacks on rival researchers such as Ralph Pite, whose Thomas Hardy: The Guarded Life (2006) furnishes a more literary alternative to Tomalin. Yet her ability to cut such a sober and congenial narrative path through an intimidating array of sources indicates that while Millgate's Thomas Hardy: A Biography Revisited (2004) remains essential for scholars, his very fastidiousness tends to slow down the narrative, whose trajectory becomes obscured by impeccably detailed footnotes and parentheses. Tomalin's calm confidence in this book is such that she can survey and synthesise information with limpid clarity, compassion, and a delicate sureness of touch. Tomalin begins her book, which was released in the US in 2007 as Thomas Hardy, by focusing on Poems of 1912–13, describing the death of Emma Hardy as "the moment when Thomas Hardy became a great poet" (xvii). This is an arresting but reductive view of how felt sensation is transmuted into poetic expression, and it is worth recalling that Hardy had already composed some exceptional poems such as "I Look into My Glass" (1898) and "In Tenebris" (1902). Tomalin contends that "the contradictions always present in Hardy, between the vulnerable, doomstruck man and the serene [End Page 543] inhabitant of the natural world" may actually have been better conveyed through the imaginative patterns of his verse. The extended series of questioning, penitential elegies for Emma are, to Tomalin "one of the finest and strangest celebrations of the dead in English poetry," and she observes of their author: "The more risks he takes the less he falters" (xx). Perhaps Tomalin herself could have taken more risks with her subject. She psychologizes Hardy's dour disenchantment as an anguished reaction to personal trauma, but surely it is a cast of his writerly sensibility? Tomalin tends to reproduce the stereotype of a monolithically "pessimistic" author grimly dissecting the injustices of a world from which God has already absconded and which must now make the bitter adjustments enforced by modernity. This construction of Hardy—paralyzed by an intractable sense of deprivation—is the authorized version promoted through university lectures. What I find in Hardy's status as a cultural embalmer, and in his obsessive fixation upon the dead, is rather different: a bizarre but compelling quality of wit. Tomalin says little about why Hardy's sometimes playful irregularities of tone and narrative tactic are so oddly enabled and stimulated by the fossil fragments of a lost yesterday. Hardy's perverse playfulness releases a creative gusto in sharp contrast to the unrelieved starkness of Tomalin's perception: her portrait of the "doomstruck" man consumed by the craft of writing, remorselessly draining vigour and brio out of the living, and turning his house at Max Gate, near Dorchester, into a kind of mausoleum. Tomalin is right to reveal how Hardy's writings are replete with memorable effects of eerie detachment, as if events are recounted by an industrious and ever-vigilant spectre. But I wanted more...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it