MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1602953186 · doi:10.1089/cell.2013.0055

Spatiotemporal Expression of DNA Demethylation Enzymes and Histone Demethylases in Bovine Embryos

2014· article· en· W1602953186 on OpenAlexafffund
Florence Pagé‐Larivière, Marc‐André Sirard

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Reprogramming · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyDemethylaseEpigeneticsDNA demethylationHistoneChromatinDNA methylationGeneticsActivation-induced (cytidine) deaminaseGeneCell biologyGene expressionMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fertilization in bovines causes profound changes in the epigenetic profile that affect both DNA methylation patterns and posttranslational histone modifications. These dynamic changes have a great potential for activating pluripotency genes and unfolding certain chromatin regions to recruit different transcription factors. Surprisingly, while the fundamental function of epigenetic remodeling is well understood, the bases of the process are still unknown. Recent developments in epigenetics suggest a multistep demethylation process that would imply the prior modification of the methylated cytosine or methyl group, followed by a DNA repair mechanism implicating enzymes such as activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AICDA) and ten-eleven translocation (TET) dioxygenase. Their functions seem to differ from one species to the other, and they are not yet well characterized in large mammals. Histones have, for their part, many associated and specific lysine demethylases (KDM). Their expression profile in large mammals is not well characterized. We have been interested in characterizing the spatiotemporal expression profile for each of the genes studied to increase our understanding of the molecular interactions following fertilization in early bovine embryo stages. Bovine oocytes and embryos at various preimplantation stages were collected following in vitro fertilization protocol. Total RNA for AICDA, TET1, TET2, TET3, KDM3A, KDM4A, KDM4C, and KDM5B was extracted, reverse transcribed into cDNA, and amplified by real-time PCR. Other embryo pools were collected, and protein localization of the genes studied was characterized. TET3 dioxygenase was present in the very first embryo stages, in contrast to TET1 and AICDA. Histone demethylases KDM3A, KDM4A, and KDM4C were expressed before and after embryonic genome activation, whereas KDM5B was mainly expressed during the blastocyst period. DNA demethylation following fertilization in bovines is not accomplished by AICDA but most probably by TET3. Histone demethylation is carried out by, among others, KDM3A, KDM4A, and KDM4C, which could act in sequence to demethylate histones prior to DNA demethylation of the female chromosomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellular ReprogrammingSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207