The Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia (Mayer and Shelton, eds.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The always-innovative Museum of Anthropology (MOA) at the University of British Columbia has reinvented itself yet again.Its expanded research facilities and new "Multiversity Galleries," which opened in 2010, are parts of an ambitious community-collaborations initiative termed "A Partnership of the Peoples."The Multiversity Galleries' big idea is that "there is never just one way of knowing and seeing the world" (p.3), a viewpoint consistent with the museum's aim "to provide access to many alternative views of reality" (p.13).This fine book elegantly expresses and illustrates the MOA's philosophy.In compiling this overview of the museum's collections, Mayer (head of the MOA's curatorial department) and Shelton (MOA director) do more than present photographs of the museum's beautiful treasures.They also highlight cultural contexts, include artists' statements, discuss important collectors, and identify gaps in knowledge or understanding.In place of anonymous "expert" identifications of objects are thoughtful object
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.054 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".