Visual Modules for Head Gesture Analysis in Intelligent Vehicle Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper a coarse-to-fine system framework for analyzing the head gesture is presented. We discuss several important modules from computer vision aspects, including the pose-invariant face detection, face tracking, pose determination and high-resolution image reconstruction for eye pupils detection. Visual cues using intensity images obtained from in-car cameras are explored. A pose-invariant face detection algorithm is used to get the initial face area; afterwards face tracking and validation step is proposed to segment the face region for pose determination. The algorithm is tested on the drivers images under natural driving conditions. Experimental results show that the algorithm is robust to the head pose changes as well as the illumination changes. In this system framework, we propose that when coarse analysis utilizing the head pose alone is not sufficient for driver's behavior analysis, a finer analysis based on the eye gaze tracking is used, which requires images with sufficient resolution. A novel super-resolution reconstruction algorithm is proposed to help reveal more facial details, so as to facilitate the pupil detection. Experiment on the synthesis data shows the effectiveness of the super-resolution reconstruction algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".